Seti@Home optimized science apps and information
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
21 Nov 2008, 09:30:45 am

Login with username, password and session length
 
If you've registered already but never got your activation email, please click here.
 
 
Seti@Home optimized science apps and information  |  Optimized Seti@Home apps  |  Windows  |  Topic: optimized sources 0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 27 Go Down Print
Author Topic: optimized sources  (Read 44318 times)
_heinz
Code Wizard
Knight who says 'Ni!'
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 718


View Profile
Re: optimized sources
« Reply #285 on: 05 Feb 2008, 05:33:42 pm »

Hi all who are reading here...
long time no post....we are working  Smiley

heinz
Logged
_heinz
Code Wizard
Knight who says 'Ni!'
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 718


View Profile
Re: optimized sources
« Reply #286 on: 04 Mar 2008, 03:33:41 pm »

Hi all,
we are still working...
Today one year in the forum now  Wink

heinz
Logged
_heinz
Code Wizard
Knight who says 'Ni!'
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 718


View Profile
Re: optimized sources
« Reply #287 on: 19 Mar 2008, 04:00:09 pm »

We are still there and the work is going on.

Happy Eastern
Joyeuse Paques 

heinz
Logged
_heinz
Code Wizard
Knight who says 'Ni!'
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 718


View Profile
Re: optimized sources
« Reply #288 on: 22 Mar 2008, 12:24:15 pm »

Hi,
during all the developement time(one year now) I'm crunching parallel 24/7, all on one machine, a  Northwood P4 2.66Mhz.
Since august 2007 (25566 at 2007-08-11) I'm going backwards in the "World Position List" and the curve looks like a typical "bathtub curve" as you can see here
this means much more new users has better machine like mine.
« Last Edit: 22 Mar 2008, 12:29:25 pm by seti_britta » Logged
Jason G
Global Moderator
Knight who says 'Ni!'
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2229


View Profile
Re: optimized sources
« Reply #289 on: 22 Mar 2008, 12:30:51 pm »

Heinz, keep in mind i did pay Aus$197 for my Wolfdale  , which is really a piece of sand about 0.25 cm squared.  That is more expensive, yet more useful than gold...
Logged
_heinz
Code Wizard
Knight who says 'Ni!'
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 718


View Profile
Re: optimized sources
« Reply #290 on: 22 Mar 2008, 12:46:37 pm »

At the moment the price of a Intel Xeon E5405 activ (BX80574E5405A) Harperton Quadcore/2000MHz, L2 Cache 12MB, Bustakt 1333, Socket LGA 771 Boxed(80Watt) is still 176,90 Euros, thats a very interesting alternative to build a 8 core.
But these dualboards are very expensive.....
heinz
modify:
178.00 Euros = 296.34 Australian dollars 

Exchange rate: 1.664847 
Rate valid as of: 22/3/2008 
-----------------------------------------
here in europa is the wolfdale E8400 2x3.0GHz BOX 6MB with 200 Euro more expensive than a Xeon E5405 Quadcore 2GHz 178,62 Euro
this give me some thinking   Shocked
« Last Edit: 22 Mar 2008, 01:24:33 pm by seti_britta » Logged
_heinz
Code Wizard
Knight who says 'Ni!'
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 718


View Profile
Re: optimized sources
« Reply #291 on: 22 Mar 2008, 01:15:51 pm »

Heinz, keep in mind i did pay Aus$197 for my Wolfdale  , which is really a piece of sand about 0.25 cm squared.  That is more expensive, yet more useful than gold...

197.00 Australian dollars = 118.33 Euros 
 
Exchange rate: 0.600656 
Rate valid as of: 22/3/2008 
-----------------------------------------
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 2x3.0GHz BOX 6MB
199,90 €
here in Germany ---> http://www.kmelektronik.de/
200.00 Euros = 332.97 Australian dollars 
 
Exchange rate: 1.664847 
Rate valid as of: 22/3/2008 
-------------------------------------------

you got a very hot price in australia   Roll Eyes


heinz
« Last Edit: 22 Mar 2008, 01:35:41 pm by seti_britta » Logged
Jason G
Global Moderator
Knight who says 'Ni!'
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2229


View Profile
Re: optimized sources
« Reply #292 on: 22 Mar 2008, 08:27:40 pm »

Yeah Not anymore Though, I checked at the same place I bought my E8400:

   " Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 (3.00Ghz/6MB/1333FSB/EMT64/XD/Dual Core)
**SHORT SUPPLY. NEXT SHIPMENT DUE MID TO LATE APRIL** "  $399

Shocked

Q6600 Quads are now $299 at the same place
Logged
_heinz
Code Wizard
Knight who says 'Ni!'
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 718


View Profile
Re: optimized sources
« Reply #293 on: 22 Mar 2008, 10:32:29 pm »

Sometime I'm not sure what todo, SkullTrail yes/no with E5405 (178 Euro)
or better wait for Nehalem and Next Generation Intel Microarchitecture
or meanwhile a cheaper resulution:  board XFX GeForce 7150/MCP630i (70 Euro) no graphiccard necessary, with a Intel Core2 Quad Q9450 4x2.67GHz BOX (300 Euro), case ram disk..all together ca 680 Euro for the hardware + software XP Professional (130 Euro) for testing our parallel stuff.....
« Last Edit: 23 Mar 2008, 08:51:24 am by seti_britta » Logged
Jason G
Global Moderator
Knight who says 'Ni!'
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2229


View Profile
Re: optimized sources
« Reply #294 on: 23 Mar 2008, 08:09:19 am »

Sometime I'm not sure what todo, SkullTrail yes/no with E5405 (178 Euro)
or better wait for Nehalem
or meanwhile a cheaper resulution:  board XFX GeForce 7150/MCP630i (70 Euro) no graphiccard necessary, with a Intel Core2 Quad Q9450 4x2.67GHz BOX (300 Euro), case ram disk..all together ca 680 Euro for the hardware + software XP Professional (130 Euro) for testing our parallel stuff.....

Honestly Heinz, I'd say it'd be difficult to go past the Q6600 at the moment.  I'd guess the Yorkfields are being held off 'till the stock of those clears a bit.  Then the Yorkfields will be awesome [If this wolfdale is anything to go by].  I am getting the feeling that the Nehalem architecture will be a fairly radical departure from what we're used to, and it may take some time for the software to follow.  Perhaps something like the OpenMP standard gives some insight there,  many cores with shared memory.

Jason
« Last Edit: 23 Mar 2008, 08:11:36 am by Jason G » Logged
_heinz
Code Wizard
Knight who says 'Ni!'
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 718


View Profile
Re: optimized sources
« Reply #295 on: 23 Mar 2008, 09:03:57 am »

Hi Jason,
please read Next Generation Intel Microarchitecture with Intel QuickPath Architecture it is a revolution and a step forward to the next generation.  Shocked
under this circumstances is it better to wait for it and meanwhile use a cheaper solution as described before.
please give feedback if you have read it.

heinz
« Last Edit: 23 Mar 2008, 09:24:04 am by seti_britta » Logged
Jason G
Global Moderator
Knight who says 'Ni!'
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2229


View Profile
Re: optimized sources
« Reply #296 on: 23 Mar 2008, 09:18:50 am »

That pretty much describes the reasons I chose to settle for a Wolfdale Right now:
  - I needed a fairlly inexpensive upgrade (well it was at the time cheap, now they have gone too high in price here)
  - My other jobs require me to support development of SSE4.1 functionality
  - My current system has limited power & cooling considerations (45 degree C desert heat, 1 10amp power circuit @240Vac, for everything)

 So the dual core suits my needs perfectly for now, but I recognise the software infrastructure required to make better use of parallelism is improving immensely, both through fine grained and thread level approaches,. So my next upgrade will probably be either Nehalem or the 32nm variant after Nehalem, depending on what my work demands.. I saw the name but don't remeber it of the next generation...
« Last Edit: 23 Mar 2008, 09:21:23 am by Jason G » Logged
Gecko_R7
Global Moderator
Knight Templar
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 287



View Profile
Re: optimized sources
« Reply #297 on: 23 Mar 2008, 12:20:27 pm »

Sometime I'm not sure what todo, SkullTrail yes/no with E5405 (178 Euro)
or better wait for Nehalem
or meanwhile a cheaper resulution: board XFX GeForce 7150/MCP630i (70 Euro) no graphiccard necessary, with a Intel Core2 Quad Q9450 4x2.67GHz BOX (300 Euro), case ram disk..all together ca 680 Euro for the hardware + software XP Professional (130 Euro) for testing our parallel stuff.....

Honestly Heinz, I'd say it'd be difficult to go past the Q6600 at the moment. I'd guess the Yorkfields are being held off 'till the stock of those clears a bit. Then the Yorkfields will be awesome [If this wolfdale is anything to go by]. I am getting the feeling that the Nehalem architecture will be a fairly radical departure from what we're used to, and it may take some time for the software to follow. Perhaps something like the OpenMP standard gives some insight there, many cores with shared memory.

Jason


I think Nehalem will be a quite expensive upgrade/transition for a bit when all costs are factored.
It's LGA1366 so factor a brand new Mobo.
Also, DDR3 is almost a given to take advantage of the new arch.

Likely to be massive price gouging and very little supply initially...ltd mobo options, and buggy release bios's.  Wouldn't be surprised for it to be at least Q2 09' before we see decent pricing and availability for us mere mortals that have budgets to consider.
We should also see some nice price drops on Penryn/Yorkfield and perhaps a new stepping as Nehalem is released.

Hard to argue against the current value and mobo selection of c2d & quadcore chips.
Pretty cheap $$$ / performance ratio.

Cheers!
Logged
Jason G
Global Moderator
Knight who says 'Ni!'
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2229


View Profile
Re: optimized sources
« Reply #298 on: 23 Mar 2008, 01:17:34 pm »

Likely to be massive price gouging and very little supply initially...ltd mobo options, and buggy release bios's.  Wouldn't be surprised for it to be at least Q2 09' before we see decent pricing and availability for us mere mortals that have budgets to consider.
We should also see some nice price drops on Penryn/Yorkfield and perhaps a new stepping as Nehalem is released.

Well priorities have a way of shifting depending on need.  As you point out p4's & AMDs of SSE2 vintage are still extremely popular according to boincstats, and dominate throughput in many respects.

What the tests seem to be showing is that Alex pretty well nailed the Core2 code, and unless we decide to tackle the other end there may be little left to do there for now (Unless, that is,  some of the relaxed validation requirements that have been spoken about are put in place, then the parallelism race may be back on in force). 

Early p4's have special characteristics to do with cache that aren't necessarily all that happy with techniques used in builds targeted for the core2 architecture.  There are speed improvement showing in the p4(SSE3) I tested, but not as great as the core2 improvements.  There might be plenty of room to tweak that and the SSE3 instructions may as well be macro encapsualted while we're there, allowing SSE2 substitution.

There is though possibly still quite a bit more opportunity to squeeze more performance from the core2 build first.  We have spoken about profile guided optimisations, which haven't been touched yet, and in fact no profiles have even been run yet to identify possible bottlenecks or problems with the build,  That is why, in my book,  it is still considered pre-alpha.  Valid results is one thing, but releasing substandard builds I'd rather leave to the software companies who have the excuse of pressure from the marketing department.

Jason
Logged
Gecko_R7
Global Moderator
Knight Templar
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 287



View Profile
Re: optimized sources
« Reply #299 on: 23 Mar 2008, 01:33:30 pm »


Well priorities have a way of shifting depending on need. As you point out p4's & AMDs of SSE2 vintage are still extremely popular according to boincstats, and dominate throughput in many respects.

What the tests seem to be showing is that Alex pretty well nailed the Core2 code, and unless we decide to tackle the other end there may be little left to do there for now (Unless, that is, some of the relaxed validation requirements that have been spoken about are put in place, then the parallelism race may be back on in force).

Early p4's have special characteristics to do with cache that aren't necessarily all that happy with techniques used in builds targeted for the core2 architecture. There are speed improvement showing in the p4(SSE3) I tested, but not as great as the core2 improvements. There might be plenty of room to tweak that and the SSE3 instructions may as well be macro encapsualted while we're there, allowing SSE2 substitution.

There is though possibly still quite a bit more opportunity to squeeze more performance from the core2 build first. We have spoken about profile guided optimisations, which haven't been touched yet, and in fact no profiles have even been run yet to identify possible bottlenecks or problems with the build, That is why, in my book, it is still considered pre-alpha. Valid results is one thing, but releasing substandard builds I'd rather leave to the software companies who have the excuse of pressure from the marketing department.

Jason

Did you intend this rseponse to be attached to other thread?
« Last Edit: 23 Mar 2008, 01:35:54 pm by Gecko_R7 » Logged
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 27 Go Up Print 
Seti@Home optimized science apps and information  |  Optimized Seti@Home apps  |  Windows  |  Topic: optimized sources « previous next »
Jump to:  


Quote!
The enemy of my enemy is not quite as much of an enemy as my enemy if they ask, and in either case, I will play nice to the enemy of my enemy only so far as it hurts my enemy for real.
- 13th century Mongol warlord trying to describe the current semiconductor marketplace after dining on tainted cheese

 
Site Statistics
Total Members:1,070
Total Posts:10,723
Total Topics:445
Downloads
Apps
Windows R-1.x25,141
Windows R-2.020,352
Windows R-2.236,615
Linux 32bit 1.x6,573
Linux 32bit 2.24,405
Linux 64bit 2.21,784
Alpha/IA64203
FreeBSD628
HPUX345
Subtotal:94,870
Source packs:4,062
Tool/WU packs:7,923
Total:157,576
GBs dl'd:281.90
Pages served
Today:2,065
Total:3,348,959
(since 6/26/2006)
173 Donations to S@H
U.S. Dollars:3,196.59
Euros:863.90
Last 24h:$ 0.00
Avg./24h:$ 6.64
Estim. total:$ 4,319.66
Latest Member:
Claggy
 
 
Seti@Home optimized science apps and information | Powered by Enigma 2.0 (RC1).
© 2003-2008, LSP Dev Team. All Rights Reserved.
Seti@Home optimized science apps and information Forums | Powered by SMF.
© 2005, Simple Machines LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!