|
|
 Author
|
Topic: GPU crunching question (Read 39696 times)
|
|
pepperammi
|
Pentium D945 @ 3.6Ghz, Nvidia 7950GT 512MB oc'ed edition, Vista x64 Ultimate with just about everything turned off for the run.
Didn't get stuck like did last time which is brilliant to see. CPU usage through first part about 25-65% all together (sorry didin't take note of cpu on the app alone) and ~22% through second half for just the app itself.
Took something like 10 minutes for me too but still great to see working. Incredible work.
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Arnulf
|
Notebook with Pentium M 1,73 GHz, 2GB RAM, Nvidia 6600 GO 128 MB, XP Pro sp2.
About 6 minutes. No errors. CPU usage at 100%.
Ran it twice - check out the stderr.txt.
Arnulf
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DerToT
|
Here's a my testrun on my Athlon64 X2 4200+ dual core with an Geforce 7600 GS.
Notes about my System:
Win XP SP2
2 GB DDR RAM
Gefroce 7600 GS with 256 MB RAM
|
|
|
« Last Edit: 27 May 2007, 06:26:32 pm by DerToT »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
popandbob
|
core 2 duo oc'ed to 2.41 (from 2.13  ) Small vid card oc. nVidia 7950GT ~4 Min CPU usage didn't even hit 40 BoB |
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
popandbob
|
core 2 duo oc'ed to 2.41 (from 2.13 ) Small vid card oc. nVidia 7950GT ~4 Min CPU usage didn't even hit 40 BoB I tried a different WU and got the same -9 result. (It was one I am currently working on for beta) Under 5.17 stock app it is at 26% compleate and no errors. (meaning no -9) CPU maxed out at 50 for the one core. files to come. BoB |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: 28 May 2007, 01:04:29 pm by popandbob »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Arnulf
|
2xOpteron 265s, 4GB RAM, Nvidia 7800GS AGP 512 MB RAM.
Ran for about 5 minutes, CPU usage: client about 75% of one core, csrss.exe about 20% of another core
I belive the csrss.exe is working at updating the CLI window output?!
Arnulf
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Jason G
|
Thought I'd Try it on my crappy old Northwood for laughs  surprisingly looks like it worked fine: Northwood 2.0A @ 2.1Ghz, 1gb DDR-400@420, ATI Radeon 9550 256mb (saphire) AGP 8x - 100% total cpu usage right through test - First Part, 84-91% setiathome, 9-16% csrss.exe ( AGP? ) -Second Part, ~35% setiathome, 65% csrss.exe Total time 14 minutes  stderr.txt & state.sah.txt attached: |
|
|
« Last Edit: 28 May 2007, 02:00:39 pm by j_groothu »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
citroja
|
man...i am gone for a month and it jumps from 4 to 11 pages!!! I just spent the past 30mins reading!
Ok I think I have most of my bugs worked out in my comps and now that work has me on a more normal schedule I can get back to helping. I will let you know how things go once I can start testing.
-citroja
P.S - keep up the good work, i am impressed to see the progress that has been made.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Devaster
|
new app : - 9 error fixed
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BiddySlayer
|
I'm amazed at how fast your churning these things out. nice work.
The new progress display is a lot better. but i still got a "-9"
It took about 6 minutes to run this time. stdrrr and results.sah attached.
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Vyper
|
Yup me too got an -9 , including the resultfiles..
//Vyper
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
popandbob
|
Ran for about 5 minutes on the beta WU I tested before.
I compared the 2 results and the GPU app spat out a whole bunch of pulses that the stock app doesn't spit out which caused the -9 result in the gpu app.
I have attached the RAR'ed files.
Beta wu included.
the logx file is the actual result from stock app.
Hope this helps!
~BoB
|
 seti.rar (285.31 KB - downloaded 6 times.)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
popandbob
|
Ran for about 5 minutes on the beta WU I tested before.
I compared the 2 results and the GPU app spat out a whole bunch of pulses that the stock app doesn't spit out which caused the -9 result in the gpu app.
I have attached the RAR'ed files.
Beta wu included.
the logx file is the actual result from stock app.
Hope this helps!
~BoB
Just ran the included wu and Im sure its the same thing. For whatever reason its reporting to many pulses. ~BoB |
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Simon
|
Hi,
just finished a run with the new app. Took 2 minutes 57 seconds this time, so a little quicker than last time.
The overflow errors seem to happen because the app reports more signals than it should currently; maybe there is an accuracy problem somewhere, or the signal thresholds are too low/high?
Regards,
Simon.
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Neoman
|
result and stderr attached
It still took more than 7 minutes to finish, but i am looking forward to the new version for 64bit system.
Good job
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote!
Hope, It is the quintessential Human delusion, Simultaneously the source for your greatest strength and your greatest weakness!- The Architect
|
 |  |  |
| |
| Site Statistics |
| Total Members: | 1,017 |
| Total Posts: | 9,055 |
| Total Topics: | 422 | | Downloads |
| Apps |
| Windows R-1.x | 25,062 |
| Windows R-2.0 | 20,286 |
| Windows R-2.2 | 36,384 |
| Linux 32bit 1.x | 6,522 |
| Linux 32bit 2.2 | 4,296 |
| Linux 64bit 2.2 | 1,710 |
| Alpha/IA64 | 185 |
| FreeBSD | 578 |
| HPUX | 321 |
| Subtotal: | 94,260 |
| Source packs: | 4,063 |
| Tool/WU packs: | 7,656 |
| Total: | 150,101 | | GBs dl'd: | 278.90 | | Pages served |
| Today: | 1,210 |
| Total: | 3,075,984 |
| (since 6/26/2006) |
| 173 Donations to S@H |
| U.S. Dollars: | 3,196.59 |
| Euros: | 863.90 |
| Last 24h: | $ 0.00 |
| Avg./24h: | $ 7.61 |
| Estim. total: | $ 4,319.66 |
Latest Member:
BOrBO$$ |
| |
 | |  |
| | |
| |
Online users/last 15m
18 Guests, 0 Users
23 Members/last 24hsunu, Jason G, Boris0407, Urs Echternacht, ajs, BOrBO$$, Morten, Krypto, Raistmer, Josef W. Segur, _heinz, The Grinch, Gecko_R7, HopkinsProg, Geek@Play, speedimic, hiamps, Archangel999, Devaster, Mongo, clk, Purple Rabbit, Bluesilvergreen
| |
| | |
|
