|
|
Pages: [1] 
|
 |
|
 Author
|
Topic: Executable Size - 2.2B vs. 2.4 (Read 545 times)
|
|
Havoc
|
How did you reduce the executable size so considerably on the new version of the Windows executable?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Josef W. Segur
|
How did you reduce the executable size so considerably on the new version of the Windows executable? To oversimplify what took a lot of work, Simon discovered that not doing the overall ipo optimization offered by the Intel compiler produced faster and smaller executables. Joe |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 
|
|
|
|
Quote!
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.- George Santayana
|
 |  |  |
| |
| Site Statistics |
| Total Members: | 1,003 |
| Total Posts: | 8,874 |
| Total Topics: | 418 | | Downloads |
| Apps |
| Windows R-1.x | 25,050 |
| Windows R-2.0 | 20,273 |
| Windows R-2.2 | 36,337 |
| Linux 32bit 1.x | 6,514 |
| Linux 32bit 2.2 | 4,276 |
| Linux 64bit 2.2 | 1,700 |
| Alpha/IA64 | 183 |
| FreeBSD | 568 |
| HPUX | 317 |
| Subtotal: | 94,150 |
| Source packs: | 4,041 |
| Tool/WU packs: | 7,581 |
| Total: | 148,913 | | GBs dl'd: | 278.16 | | Pages served |
| Today: | 473 |
| Total: | 3,040,289 |
| (since 6/26/2006) |
| 173 Donations to S@H |
| U.S. Dollars: | 3,196.59 |
| Euros: | 863.90 |
| Last 24h: | $ 0.00 |
| Avg./24h: | $ 7.75 |
| Estim. total: | $ 4,319.66 |
Latest Member:
teesee |
| |
 | |  |
| | |
| |
Online users/last 15m
8 Guests, 0 Users
22 Members/last 24hRaistmer, sunu, _heinz, KWSN - jonnyv, Devaster, msattler, Gecko_R7, Josef W. Segur, Jason G, Tye, Geek@Play, zvonas, Urs Echternacht, hiamps, areese, ajs, clk, Gelirhil, teesee, Bluesilvergreen, JDWhale, Vyper
| |
| | |
|
