|
|
Pages: [1] 
|
 |
|
 Author
|
Topic: Executable Size - 2.2B vs. 2.4 (Read 584 times)
|
|
Havoc
|
How did you reduce the executable size so considerably on the new version of the Windows executable?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Josef W. Segur
|
How did you reduce the executable size so considerably on the new version of the Windows executable? To oversimplify what took a lot of work, Simon discovered that not doing the overall ipo optimization offered by the Intel compiler produced faster and smaller executables. Joe |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 
|
|
|
|
Quote!
To succeed in politics, it is often necessary to rise above your principles.- Murphy's Law
|
 |  |  |
| |
| Site Statistics |
| Total Members: | 1,046 |
| Total Posts: | 9,974 |
| Total Topics: | 440 | | Downloads |
| Apps |
| Windows R-1.x | 25,105 |
| Windows R-2.0 | 20,321 |
| Windows R-2.2 | 36,511 |
| Linux 32bit 1.x | 6,551 |
| Linux 32bit 2.2 | 4,349 |
| Linux 64bit 2.2 | 1,751 |
| Alpha/IA64 | 193 |
| FreeBSD | 606 |
| HPUX | 334 |
| Subtotal: | 94,588 |
| Source packs: | 4,121 |
| Tool/WU packs: | 7,791 |
| Total: | 154,080 | | GBs dl'd: | 280.45 | | Pages served |
| Today: | 4,103 |
| Total: | 3,216,361 |
| (since 6/26/2006) |
| 173 Donations to S@H |
| U.S. Dollars: | 3,196.59 |
| Euros: | 863.90 |
| Last 24h: | $ 0.00 |
| Avg./24h: | $ 7.08 |
| Estim. total: | $ 4,319.66 |
Latest Member:
Leaps-from-Shadows |
| |
 | |  |
| | |
| |
Online users/last 15m
12 Guests, 1 User
Pappa
23 Members/last 24hPappa, autocrosser, Jason G, Geek@Play, clk, Josef W. Segur, KarVi, gaulois952, Haselgrove, bytzmaster, Urs Echternacht, Leaps-from-Shadows, Gecko_R7, Raistmer, sunu, dfousse, WHRoeder, piwi, Devaster, XP-Freak, speedimic, BerndBrot, Yin Gang
| |
| | |
|
