|
|
Pages: [1] 
|
 |
|
 Author
|
Topic: Executable Size - 2.2B vs. 2.4 (Read 601 times)
|
|
Havoc
|
How did you reduce the executable size so considerably on the new version of the Windows executable?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Josef W. Segur
|
How did you reduce the executable size so considerably on the new version of the Windows executable? To oversimplify what took a lot of work, Simon discovered that not doing the overall ipo optimization offered by the Intel compiler produced faster and smaller executables. Joe |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 
|
|
|
|
Quote!
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.- Bertrand Russell
|
 |  |  |
| |
| Site Statistics |
| Total Members: | 1,072 |
| Total Posts: | 10,834 |
| Total Topics: | 447 | | Downloads |
| Apps |
| Windows R-1.x | 25,148 |
| Windows R-2.0 | 20,356 |
| Windows R-2.2 | 36,628 |
| Linux 32bit 1.x | 6,574 |
| Linux 32bit 2.2 | 4,406 |
| Linux 64bit 2.2 | 1,784 |
| Alpha/IA64 | 204 |
| FreeBSD | 629 |
| HPUX | 346 |
| Subtotal: | 94,896 |
| Source packs: | 4,071 |
| Tool/WU packs: | 7,931 |
| Total: | 157,888 | | GBs dl'd: | 282.03 | | Pages served |
| Today: | 2,620 |
| Total: | 3,359,636 |
| (since 6/26/2006) |
| 173 Donations to S@H |
| U.S. Dollars: | 3,196.59 |
| Euros: | 863.90 |
| Last 24h: | $ 0.00 |
| Avg./24h: | $ 6.62 |
| Estim. total: | $ 4,319.66 |
Latest Member:
Luke@SETI |
| |
 | |  |
| | |
| |
Online users/last 15m
15 Guests, 2 Users
Jason G, Haselgrove
23 Members/last 24hJason G, Haselgrove, Josef W. Segur, Luke@SETI, KarVi, Raistmer, Devaster, Hav0k, WinterKnight, Leaps-from-Shadows, ajs, sunu, tfp, Fivestar Crashtest, WHRoeder, Yin Gang, elec999, firefox, Geek@Play, Urs Echternacht, Claggy, _heinz, Slawek
| |
| | |
|
