|
|
Pages: [1]
|
 |
|
Author
|
Topic: Branching out (Read 1526 times)
|
|
Aragon Speed
|
Have you guys ever thought of branching out and optimising other boinc projects? I was thinking that some of the other main projects would benefit from your expertise. (Rosetta springs to mind.)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Josef W. Segur
|
No other project is open source, and IMO no other project is nearly as worthy. Joe
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Aragon Speed
|
No other project is open source My bad.  I assumed that all bionic projects were open source by definition. Ah well.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Crunch3r
Porting Team
Knight Templar
Offline
Posts: 463
|
No other project is open source, and IMO no other project is nearly as worthy. Joe
That's not quite true. Nanohive@home is open source and Leiden Classical offers source too. Also there is Roseta@home, you have to ask the rosetta administration to get the source. Of course there's still the question of what is to be considered worthy...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I want to share something with you: The three little sentences that will get you through life. Number 1: Cover for me. Number 2: Oh, good idea, Boss! Number 3: It was like that when I got here.
Homer Simpson
|
|
|
|
Aragon Speed
|
Well as Rosetta is trying to find cures for cancer, HIV and others, I think that might rank fairly high on the worthiness scale 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Crunch3r
Porting Team
Knight Templar
Offline
Posts: 463
|
Well as Rosetta is trying to find cures for cancer, HIV and others, I think that might rank fairly high on the worthiness scale  Same as Simap, WCG proteins@home, predictor@home Folding@home etc... (and hundreds of the same kind before) As to now nothing usefull found at all. IMO i really don't need the hassle with rosetta@home at all, some other guys allready got the source (i think "who?" and someone from AMD). So let them figure out how to optimize it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I want to share something with you: The three little sentences that will get you through life. Number 1: Cover for me. Number 2: Oh, good idea, Boss! Number 3: It was like that when I got here.
Homer Simpson
|
|
|
|
Aragon Speed
|
Well as Rosetta is trying to find cures for cancer, HIV and others, I think that might rank fairly high on the worthiness scale  Same as Simap, WCG proteins@home, predictor@home Folding@home etc... (and hundreds of the same kind before) As to now nothing usefull found at all. IMO i really don't need the hassle with rosetta@home at all, some other guys allready got the source (i think "who?" and someone from AMD). So let them figure out how to optimize it. Sounds like a plan to me 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
|
|
Quote!
Every man is guilty of all the good he didn't do.- Voltaire
|
 |  |  |
| |
| Site Statistics |
| Total Members: | 1,183 |
| Total Posts: | 12,365 |
| Total Topics: | 481 | | Downloads |
| Apps |
| Windows R-1.x | 25,177 |
| Windows R-2.0 | 20,387 |
| Windows R-2.2 | 36,758 |
| Linux 32bit 1.x | 6,588 |
| Linux 32bit 2.2 | 4,468 |
| Linux 64bit 2.2 | 1,834 |
| Alpha/IA64 | 216 |
| FreeBSD | 655 |
| HPUX | 355 |
| Subtotal: | 95,212 |
| Source packs: | 4,168 |
| Tool/WU packs: | 8,138 |
| Total: | 162,443 | | GBs dl'd: | 283.89 | | Pages served |
| Today: | 782 |
| Total: | 3,565,946 |
| (since 6/26/2006) |
| 173 Donations to S@H |
| U.S. Dollars: | 3,196.59 |
| Euros: | 863.90 |
| Last 24h: | $ 0.00 |
| Avg./24h: | $ 6.20 |
| Estim. total: | $ 4,319.66 |
Latest Member: HitMaker |
| |
 | |  |
 |  |  |
| |
Online users/last 15m
14 Guests, 1 User
Haselgrove 35 Members/last 24hHaselgrove, Jason G, tfp, Urs Echternacht, Raistmer, The Grinch, Devaster, Gecko_R7, popandbob, Josef W. Segur, arkayn, firefox, Macbeth, Geek@Play, Maik, k1lv9h, robocop2002, sunu, _heinz, Alex Kraft, WHRoeder, westsail, Radiohead, Yurik, cyrda, skyline798, Crunch3r, FalconFly, clk, Myster65, ajs, Andreas_pdm, ssab01, HitMaker, Slawek
| |
 | |  |
|