|
|
 Author
|
Topic: optimized sources (Read 224770 times)
|
|
_heinz
|
Updated Installers, v0.40 for Windows is available on the MainPagePlease read Installer v0.40 release notes before you install. Thanks to all who are involved anyhow. We have now more than 160 000 calls on this thread, thank you to all readers looking up here. _heinz |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
_heinz
|
I always wanted to know how much energy my machines need to crunch. I bought last a Watt measure unit and have now some values of my machines. 840 W, max 874 W V8-Xeon (1 GTX570, 2 GTX470) 230 W, max 270 W P4 with AGP HD4670 66 W, laptop i3, GT540M 31 W, R3600 ION ------------------------------------- 1167 W for all my machines 1,167 KWh 28,008 KWh per day 840,24 KWh per month If now the price per KWh is known you can calculate your crunching costs. In my case in France we have 8 hours/day to 0.0567 Euro and 16 hours/day 0,0916 Euro per KWh 280,08 KWh * 0.0567 Euro = 15,88 Euro 560.16 KWh * 0,0916 Euro = 51,31 Euro -------------------------------------------------- summary 67,19 Euro + 19,5% Mwst = 13,10 Euro + power-connection costs/month = 7,50 Euro -------------------------------------------------------- Total = 87,79 Euro/month without internet connection costs actual credit/month is 36,763,527 87,79 Euro / 36,763527 Mio cc = 2,387964571516764 Euro per Mio cc Today I have 326,832403 Mio credit 326,832403 Mio * 2,387964571516764 Euro/Mio = 780,4641991876895 Euro my summary total crunching cost ~ 780,46 Euro ------------------------------------------------------------ Remark: in Germany the price per KWh is 0,24 Euro strompreise-Deutschland840,24 KWh / month * 0,24 Euro = 201,66 Euro/month in Germany ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 201,66 Euro/month in Germany 87,79 Euro/month in France happy crunching in France, bleu blanc rouge  _heinz |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mike
Alpha Tester
Knight who says 'Ni!'
 Offline
Posts: 1181
|
That can´t be true Heinz.
I´m consuming 10.000 KW a year (dont ask) all in all.
I (only) pay €180 a month all together.
My FX is very power hungry even overclocked.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
_heinz
|
That can´t be true Heinz.
Hi Mike, all depends how many Graphicadapters are set into your FX, perhaps you will be surprized if you test the power with a Watt-meter. V8-Xeon has 3 graphicadapters( 1 GTX570 + 2 GTX470) GTX570 runs at 832MHz GTX470 runs at 730MHz GTX470 runs at 730MHz measured max power is 3,84 Ampere 220V * 3,84A = 844VA =844W =0,844KW for V8-Xeon, what I have seen its is no big difference if i suspend work on all 8 cpus or not. will make some measurement in the next days to document it. heinz |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: 27 Mar 2012, 05:20:10 am by _heinz »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Claggy
Alpha Tester
Knight who says 'Ni!'
Offline
Posts: 2558
|
_heinz, can you do an updated AP v6 Atom app when you have a chance please, while r555 & r557 are faster than r409 on an Atom, they are nowhere near as fast as your special Atom builds,
See the FFTW 3.3.1 static library development thread for benches on my Atom N450
Claggy
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
_heinz
|
_heinz, can you do an updated AP v6 Atom app when you have a chance please, while r555 & r557 are faster than r409 on an Atom, they are nowhere near as fast as your special Atom builds,
See the FFTW 3.3.1 static library development thread for benches on my Atom N450
Claggy
Hi Claggy, have seen it... be patient...have a lot around my ears at the moment. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Claggy
Alpha Tester
Knight who says 'Ni!'
Offline
Posts: 2558
|
_heinz, can you do an updated AP v6 Atom app when you have a chance please, while r555 & r557 are faster than r409 on an Atom, they are nowhere near as fast as your special Atom builds,
See the FFTW 3.3.1 static library development thread for benches on my Atom N450
Claggy
Hi Claggy, have seen it... be patient...have a lot around my ears at the moment. O.K, thanks, i didn't know if you had seen it or not, Claggy |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
_heinz
|
_heinz, can you do an updated AP v6 Atom app when you have a chance please, while r555 & r557 are faster than r409 on an Atom, they are nowhere near as fast as your special Atom builds,
See the FFTW 3.3.1 static library development thread for benches on my Atom N450
Claggy
done, available in the Beta download area heinz |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
_heinz
|
How does this special astropulse v6 build for ATOM CPU's run shows the following quick test of ap_6.01r557_SSE3_ATOM_IXE_MKLS_O3.exe More results in the Beta test area. Bench results file R3600-20120328-0439-benchAP.txt stored in .\Testdatas\ directory. Quick timetable WU : AP_single_pass.wu ap_5.05r409_SSE.exe -verbose : Elapsed 2118.152 secs CPU 2110.569 secs ap_5.05r468_SSE3_ATOM_IXE_MKLS_O3.exe -verbose : Elapsed 1532.965 secs, speedup: 27.63% ratio: 1.38x CPU 1528.560 secs, speedup: 27.58% ratio: 1.38x ap_6.01r548_SSE_331_noAVX.exe -verbose : Elapsed 2155.741 secs, speedup: -1.77% ratio: 0.98x CPU 2145.170 secs, speedup: -1.64% ratio: 0.98x ap_6.01r557_SSE3_ATOM_IXE_MKLS_O3.exe -verbose : Elapsed 1530.656 secs, speedup: 27.74% ratio: 1.38x CPU 1524.067 secs, speedup: 27.79% ratio: 1.38x WU : Raistmer's_tiny.wu ap_5.05r409_SSE.exe -verbose : Elapsed 932.693 secs CPU 926.724 secs ap_5.05r468_SSE3_ATOM_IXE_MKLS_O3.exe -verbose : Elapsed 650.598 secs, speedup: 30.25% ratio: 1.43x CPU 646.219 secs, speedup: 30.27% ratio: 1.43x ap_6.01r548_SSE_331_noAVX.exe -verbose : Elapsed 850.933 secs, speedup: 8.77% ratio: 1.10x CPU 846.961 secs, speedup: 8.61% ratio: 1.09x ap_6.01r557_SSE3_ATOM_IXE_MKLS_O3.exe -verbose : Elapsed 629.632 secs, speedup: 32.49% ratio: 1.48x CPU 626.048 secs, speedup: 32.45% ratio: 1.48x WU : sigind_v5.wu ap_5.05r409_SSE.exe -verbose : Elapsed 4540.926 secs CPU 4508.039 secs ap_5.05r468_SSE3_ATOM_IXE_MKLS_O3.exe -verbose : Elapsed 3578.609 secs, speedup: 21.19% ratio: 1.27x CPU 3539.101 secs, speedup: 21.49% ratio: 1.27x ap_6.01r548_SSE_331_noAVX.exe -verbose : Elapsed 4875.686 secs, speedup: -7.37% ratio: 0.93x CPU 4810.275 secs, speedup: -6.70% ratio: 0.94x ap_6.01r557_SSE3_ATOM_IXE_MKLS_O3.exe -verbose : Elapsed 3355.997 secs, speedup: 26.09% ratio: 1.35x CPU 3340.746 secs, speedup: 25.89% ratio: 1.35x ====================================== _heinz  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
_heinz
|
what I have seen its is no big difference if i suspend work on all 8 cpus or not. will make some measurement in the next days to document it. some new measurement for V8-Xeon ~300W if I switch on the machine, selftest, no OS loaded ~286W windows is ready, logonscreen ~830W crunching distributed network on all 3 grapicadapters and run on 8 cpu's primegrids Sophie Germain (LLR) ~743W suspend work on CPU's, still GPU work is done ~370W suspend work on GPU's, wait till all fans are down, allow work on CPU's means primegrid Sophie Germain (LLR) need still ~70W-90W to run on all 8 CPU's The crunching 3 GPU's need then 743W -300W = 443W ,because the machine's base load power is ~300W. summary we can say 2GTX470 + 1GTX570 need 450W for crunching (GPU load 99%) the relation between the power of 3GPU/ 8CPU is 443W / 70W = 6,33 : 1 Total power of the crunching v8-Xeon is ~840W (820 - 860) _heinz |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: 29 Mar 2012, 10:21:44 am by _heinz »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_heinz
|
As I'm running primegrid "The Riesel Problem LLR 6.13" it comes to a v8-xeon_overheating CPU2 70 grd C FBDIMM2 104 grd C FBDIMM3 102 grd C FBDIMM4 100 grd C Still GPU2 run up to 100 grd and clocked down from 770 to 405MHz GPU1 72 grd C GPU3 80 grd C _heinz |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
_heinz
|
New i7-3770 Ivy-Bridge is available in europa. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ INTEL Core i7-3770K @ 4 x 4,5GHz, Quad-Core "Ivy Bridge" • TDP: 77W • Fertigung: 22nm • DMI: 5GT/s •L2-Cache: 4x 256kB • L3-Cache: 8MB shared • Memory Controller: Dual Channel PC3-12800U (DDR3-1600) • Turbo Boost, Hyper-Threading, Multiplikator frei wählbar. Intels Prozessoren mit Codenamen Ivy Bridge werden in 22-Nanometer-Technik gefertigt. Sie bieten neue Sicherheitsfunktionen, erweiterte Stromsparfunktionen und einen neuen Grafikkern, der DirectX 11 unterstützt. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ GAINWARD GeForce GTX 680 Phantom, 4GB GDDR5, 2x DVI, HDMI, DisplayPort. Chiptakt: 1084MHz, Speichertakt: 1575MHz, Shadertakt: 1084MHz • Chip: GK104 • Speicherinterface: 256-bit • Stream-Prozessoren: 1536 • Textureinheiten: 128 • Fertigung: 28nm • Maximaler Verbrauch: 195W • DirectX: 11.1 • Shader Modell: 5.0 • Bauweise: Triple-Slot • Schnittstelle: PCIe 3.0 • Besonderheiten: werkseitig übertaktet, unterstützt HDCP, 4-Way-SLI ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Have a look at this Low-Noise-Gaming_PC_heinz |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
_heinz
|
v8-Xeon with triple oced NV-adapters
GTX570
GPU Takt (Geometric Domain) 850 MHz (Original: 732 MHz, overclock: 16%)
GPU Takt (Shader Domain) 1700 MHz (Original: 1464 MHz, overclock: 16%)
GTX470
GPU Takt (Geometric Domain) 770 MHz (Original: 607 MHz, overclock: 27%)
GPU Takt (Shader Domain) 1540 MHz (Original: 1215 MHz, overclock: 27%)
GTX470
GPU Takt (Geometric Domain) 780 MHz (Original: 607 MHz, overclock: 29%)
GPU Takt (Shader Domain) 1560 MHz (Original: 1215 MHz, overclock: 28%)
so far the old GTX470 are good overclocked, all air cooled
_heinz
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote!
Two wrongs are only the beginning.- Murphy's Law
|
 |  |  |
| |
Online users/last 15m
31 Guests, 1 User
ML1
14 Members/last 24hML1, arkayn, KarVi, Richard Haselgrove, Pizzadude, mr.mac52, Urs Echternacht, Claggy, Raistmer, Mike, Josef W. Segur, Hans Dorn, Morten, Devaster
| |
 | |  |
|
